Alright, so I haven't done this very much, and I'd like to blame it on writer's block, when in reality, I know there is a deeper issue at hand. I think I'm really just afraid that if I began to take this writing thing seriously, I'd write something absolutely horrible and then I'd have to face up to the cold typed-up proof that I am artistically, rhetorically, and stylistically challenged in every way, shape, and form. In cruel irony, my own clumsily written words would stare out at me from my computer screen and in their own silent way, spell out yet another failed endeavor at greatness. Art, dance, music and their required muses have all abandoned me in the past. I'm afraid to shine a light in on the cob-webbed corner of my mind's attic that I've reserved for writing. If I should find it empty and wanting, what is left for me, but a mere appreciation and meloncholy yearning for the humanities? It's not enough for me to just appreciate; to sit in the audience and through some strange osmosis, soak in the bohemian spirit. It is not enough. I need to create it, find it, feel it within myself.
My hands are fevered, but my fingertips are cold to the touch.
I heard a quote today that went a little something like this: "Good writing is produced when the walls of safety are broken down."
But it's so easy to play it safe. There are so many things I fear. As previously mentioned, and most of all, I fear failure. Failed genius. We can't all be a Wordsworth, an Eliot, a Keats, or an Orwell. If everyone were geniuses, where would the novelty lie? And if that is true, then is there shame in normality? Is it ok to just be a Mather? Sometimes my understanding is not crystalline, and my memory often fails me. Is that alright? Is it enough to be satisfied with the alotted amount of brains I have been given? I am who I am, and I should be content and settled with that idea, because I really am quite fond of my life and what I've done with it so far. But is it enough? I can't help but want to fill the shoes of the prolific writers mentioned above. I am man, afterall, and as such I strive to improve myself, even to perfection. But where does one draw the line between the realistic and idealstic ambitions that beset our minds. Although I have many fears regarding this complex issue, my biggest fear is this: What if my ambitions exceed my abilities?
Why do I write in the first place? Certainly it's not to be well read, as most of my writing is private, with small exceptions, including this blog (scary). But if anyone has read to this point of my lengthy ramblings, they are either madly sticken with love for me or are waiting out an unfortunate case of insomnia. If it is the latter, may I recommend, dear reader, briefly jotting down whatever troubles your mind in a journal, drinking a tall glass of milk, and then settling into bed, leaving all your worries in your journal until the morning. Sleep will come and the you won't need to read my ramblings any further.
Oh, tangents-another great downfall.
So why do I write?
I should be writing for myself, as if there was no one else in the world who was going to be sifting through the complexities of my exposed mind. But I do write for others. I write for all those in academia, stretching my neck out and balancing on my tippy-toes, hoping to measure up to their prestigious expectations of excellence and brilliance. I write for my family, hoping to stand out against the backdrop of their loud talents, hoping to find my own individuality, hoping to find something I can put my personal stamp on and claim as my own. And there is this pukishly romantic side of me (that I will only claim as one of my sides, and not fully as myself) that writes for him. Who is he? The name is irrelevant, because it changes from year to year. Call him a muse. Call him a catalyst. Call him Dick, Mark, or John. It doesn't matter. He's more of an idea than a man. He's the one who, unlike you, my poor insomniactic reader, is madly sticken with love for me. It's true. Even at this very moment he is falling in love with each nonsensical sentence streaming from my fingertips, each misplaced semi-colon, each wanting attempt at rhetoric.
I write for him, and I write for them, but who are they and is it enough?
Is it enough? I'm not so sure.
I have decided to start something new and uncomfortable. I am breaking my carefully built walls of safety down, brick by brick, word by word, and I am now writing for me.
Just for me.
So do not be alarmed, offended, or hurt, dear reader, if I do not address you all too often in the future. Any further references made to a crazy insomniac will be directed soley to myself. Please do not think this too selfish. But I'm writing for me now, and not for you.
Perhaps when I have mastered writing for myself, I can then write something truly useful for others, and by doing so, realize my own unique inner-genius. I gather that I won't find a Coleridge or a Dickensen by any means, large or small. But I hope to find a Mather who is no longer afraid to mark her work with her name, a Mather who is proud to be just that-Evelyn Mather.
1 comment:
Love it Evelyn! I must say I am a harsh and tough critic of those who write. Oddly enough, I fall short of my own standards:) You truly have a talent and I enjoy reading it. Keep it up!
Post a Comment